<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How To Setup Your Windows CMD Window To Be Usable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://parand.com/say/index.php/2009/07/02/how-to-setup-your-windows-cmd-window-to-be-usable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://parand.com/say/index.php/2009/07/02/how-to-setup-your-windows-cmd-window-to-be-usable/</link>
	<description>Parand Tony Darugar: A Cruel and Petty Dictator</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:10:42 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon Miller</title>
		<link>http://parand.com/say/index.php/2009/07/02/how-to-setup-your-windows-cmd-window-to-be-usable/comment-page-1/#comment-249205</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 20:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parand.com/say/?p=813#comment-249205</guid>
		<description>I honestly was thinking of tab completion when posting my remark about readline support. After reading your reply, I&#039;ve re-opened the CMD window and discovered that the tab completion was added at some point. They say you learn something every day, right?

If I wanted to continue to complain, I&#039;d say something about the tab completion performing completion on files vs. with commands as well or perhaps my favorite readline convention of ^R to perform a reverse search, but instead I&#039;ll concede and agree with you that the CMD shell really is more usable than many people realize.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I honestly was thinking of tab completion when posting my remark about readline support. After reading your reply, I&#8217;ve re-opened the CMD window and discovered that the tab completion was added at some point. They say you learn something every day, right?</p>
<p>If I wanted to continue to complain, I&#8217;d say something about the tab completion performing completion on files vs. with commands as well or perhaps my favorite readline convention of ^R to perform a reverse search, but instead I&#8217;ll concede and agree with you that the CMD shell really is more usable than many people realize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parand</title>
		<link>http://parand.com/say/index.php/2009/07/02/how-to-setup-your-windows-cmd-window-to-be-usable/comment-page-1/#comment-249202</link>
		<dc:creator>Parand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 19:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parand.com/say/?p=813#comment-249202</guid>
		<description>Jon, any particular parts of readline you find missing in cmd? There are plenty, but I still find the most important ones are there: previous/next command and tab completion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon, any particular parts of readline you find missing in cmd? There are plenty, but I still find the most important ones are there: previous/next command and tab completion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Miller</title>
		<link>http://parand.com/say/index.php/2009/07/02/how-to-setup-your-windows-cmd-window-to-be-usable/comment-page-1/#comment-249173</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 17:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parand.com/say/?p=813#comment-249173</guid>
		<description>I do those same things with my windows CMD settings, but I still end up concluding that it&#039;s unusable and look for alternatives. I don&#039;t think I&#039;ll be happy until they integrate readline capabilities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do those same things with my windows CMD settings, but I still end up concluding that it&#8217;s unusable and look for alternatives. I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ll be happy until they integrate readline capabilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

