<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anatomy of a Paypal Phishing Scam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://parand.com/say/index.php/2006/07/06/anatomy-of-a-paypal-phishing-scam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://parand.com/say/index.php/2006/07/06/anatomy-of-a-paypal-phishing-scam/</link>
	<description>Parand Tony Darugar: A Cruel and Petty Dictator</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 16:52:02 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: N.E.Y.O</title>
		<link>http://parand.com/say/index.php/2006/07/06/anatomy-of-a-paypal-phishing-scam/comment-page-1/#comment-284237</link>
		<dc:creator>N.E.Y.O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parand.com/say/index.php/2006/07/06/anatomy-of-a-paypal-phishing-scam/#comment-284237</guid>
		<description>Hi,
   Please can someone tell me how to get a scam page receipt that i can edit for  ioffer  for willing to pay......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
   Please can someone tell me how to get a scam page receipt that i can edit for  ioffer  for willing to pay&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Bourn</title>
		<link>http://parand.com/say/index.php/2006/07/06/anatomy-of-a-paypal-phishing-scam/comment-page-1/#comment-211015</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Bourn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 13:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parand.com/say/index.php/2006/07/06/anatomy-of-a-paypal-phishing-scam/#comment-211015</guid>
		<description>Bottom line is simple.
If you ever receive such a notice, close the email (You really shouldn&#039;t have opened it in the first place.) and manually type in and visit the service requesting the information. If the information is true you would be prompted once logged in, if false you would not see any such notifications.

Furthermore official links are always displayed as they are.

Examples:
Hover your mouse over the link to see the differences, this is always a good practice. (HTML Will most likely be disabled. in which case this example wont work so well, but you can still note the changes.)

Official Link;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.paypal.com/us/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_login&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.paypal.com/us/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_login&lt;/a&gt;

Fake Link;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fakesitethatwantsyourmoney.com/blah/blah/blah.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.paypal.com/us/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_login&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bottom line is simple.<br />
If you ever receive such a notice, close the email (You really shouldn&#8217;t have opened it in the first place.) and manually type in and visit the service requesting the information. If the information is true you would be prompted once logged in, if false you would not see any such notifications.</p>
<p>Furthermore official links are always displayed as they are.</p>
<p>Examples:<br />
Hover your mouse over the link to see the differences, this is always a good practice. (HTML Will most likely be disabled. in which case this example wont work so well, but you can still note the changes.)</p>
<p>Official Link;<br />
<a href="http://www.paypal.com/us/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_login" rel="nofollow">http://www.paypal.com/us/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_login</a></p>
<p>Fake Link;<br />
<a href="http://www.fakesitethatwantsyourmoney.com/blah/blah/blah.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.paypal.com/us/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_login</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ¿Porqué mi dominio IDN se ve tan raro en Firefox? &#124; Sociedad de la Información</title>
		<link>http://parand.com/say/index.php/2006/07/06/anatomy-of-a-paypal-phishing-scam/comment-page-1/#comment-136269</link>
		<dc:creator>¿Porqué mi dominio IDN se ve tan raro en Firefox? &#124; Sociedad de la Información</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parand.com/say/index.php/2006/07/06/anatomy-of-a-paypal-phishing-scam/#comment-136269</guid>
		<description>[...] Standard Deviations. Parand Tony Darugar&#8217;s Babblings. Anatomy of a Paypal Phishing Scamhttp://www.parand.com/say/index.php/2006/07/06/anatomy-of-a-paypal-phishing-scam/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Standard Deviations. Parand Tony Darugar&rsquo;s Babblings. Anatomy of a Paypal Phishing Scamhttp://www.parand.com/say/index.php/2006/07/06/anatomy-of-a-paypal-phishing-scam/ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The China Tattler</title>
		<link>http://parand.com/say/index.php/2006/07/06/anatomy-of-a-paypal-phishing-scam/comment-page-1/#comment-84636</link>
		<dc:creator>The China Tattler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 06:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parand.com/say/index.php/2006/07/06/anatomy-of-a-paypal-phishing-scam/#comment-84636</guid>
		<description>Why would anyone trust Paypal?

A phishing scam can be uncovered here, but the good folks at Paypal don&#039;t seem to actively do anything to find them and stop them.

 A guy sitting at home using his laptop can uncover all this information, but the corporate folks at Paypal do nothing.

Shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would anyone trust Paypal?</p>
<p>A phishing scam can be uncovered here, but the good folks at Paypal don&#8217;t seem to actively do anything to find them and stop them.</p>
<p> A guy sitting at home using his laptop can uncover all this information, but the corporate folks at Paypal do nothing.</p>
<p>Shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: artcoder</title>
		<link>http://parand.com/say/index.php/2006/07/06/anatomy-of-a-paypal-phishing-scam/comment-page-1/#comment-40744</link>
		<dc:creator>artcoder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 00:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parand.com/say/index.php/2006/07/06/anatomy-of-a-paypal-phishing-scam/#comment-40744</guid>
		<description>Nice article.  I also wanted to point out that a clear tipoff that this is a fraudelent email is that it addressed you as &quot;Dear valued PayPal member&quot;.  The real PayPal will address you by your name or by your business.  

And if someone did accidentally type in their correct login and password into the phishing site, that means that the fraudster had gotten your login. If that ever happens to anyone, go to the real PayPal site and change your password immediately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article.  I also wanted to point out that a clear tipoff that this is a fraudelent email is that it addressed you as &#8220;Dear valued PayPal member&#8221;.  The real PayPal will address you by your name or by your business.  </p>
<p>And if someone did accidentally type in their correct login and password into the phishing site, that means that the fraudster had gotten your login. If that ever happens to anyone, go to the real PayPal site and change your password immediately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parand Darugar</title>
		<link>http://parand.com/say/index.php/2006/07/06/anatomy-of-a-paypal-phishing-scam/comment-page-1/#comment-25595</link>
		<dc:creator>Parand Darugar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 23:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parand.com/say/index.php/2006/07/06/anatomy-of-a-paypal-phishing-scam/#comment-25595</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s interesting that they didn&#039;t do SSL. Makes sense actually - the average person wouldn&#039;t even notice if they were on an ssl site or not, and having an SSL certificate complicates things. Might as well skip it so you don&#039;t get the IE/Firefox SSL warning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s interesting that they didn&#8217;t do SSL. Makes sense actually &#8211; the average person wouldn&#8217;t even notice if they were on an ssl site or not, and having an SSL certificate complicates things. Might as well skip it so you don&#8217;t get the IE/Firefox SSL warning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pooya</title>
		<link>http://parand.com/say/index.php/2006/07/06/anatomy-of-a-paypal-phishing-scam/comment-page-1/#comment-25580</link>
		<dc:creator>Pooya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 20:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parand.com/say/index.php/2006/07/06/anatomy-of-a-paypal-phishing-scam/#comment-25580</guid>
		<description>Got a good one today, faking as BofA.  Subject: Bank of America Member (Your Account Suspension Notice )  which could be plausible given my habits :)  Had the BofA logo and even showed the link as ....sitekey... that BofA now uses (http://sitekey.verfing.accountinformation.secuirtydepartment.bankofamerica.com )  though it actually goes to http://gameton.com/images/bankofamerica.com/bankofamerica.com/cig-bin/signondo/Online/cigi-bin/ssologincontroller/SignIn/

Given the URL structure, I assume they have this for every bank and just send out random ones.  The site, if you go it is done very well, basically captured the old login from BofA site and put their own piece in the middle.  All the other links of the page go to the actual BofA site.  You can enter anything into the username/password and it lets you in and then asks for lots and lots of info.  This piece they screwed up on, because there&#039;s things your bank would never ask you for.

Tried this in IE7 and its anti-phishing is of no help, though this particular pisher didn&#039;t even bother to get the SSL certificate, its just plain HTTP.  Anyway, overall they&#039;re getting much better and this is going to be a real problem for people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got a good one today, faking as BofA.  Subject: Bank of America Member (Your Account Suspension Notice )  which could be plausible given my habits <img src='http://parand.com/say/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   Had the BofA logo and even showed the link as &#8230;.sitekey&#8230; that BofA now uses (<a href="http://sitekey.verfing.accountinformation.secuirtydepartment.bankofamerica.com" rel="nofollow">http://sitekey.verfing.accountinformation.secuirtydepartment.bankofamerica.com</a> )  though it actually goes to <a href="http://gameton.com/images/bankofamerica.com/bankofamerica.com/cig-bin/signondo/Online/cigi-bin/ssologincontroller/SignIn/" rel="nofollow">http://gameton.com/images/bankofamerica.com/bankofamerica.com/cig-bin/signondo/Online/cigi-bin/ssologincontroller/SignIn/</a></p>
<p>Given the URL structure, I assume they have this for every bank and just send out random ones.  The site, if you go it is done very well, basically captured the old login from BofA site and put their own piece in the middle.  All the other links of the page go to the actual BofA site.  You can enter anything into the username/password and it lets you in and then asks for lots and lots of info.  This piece they screwed up on, because there&#8217;s things your bank would never ask you for.</p>
<p>Tried this in IE7 and its anti-phishing is of no help, though this particular pisher didn&#8217;t even bother to get the SSL certificate, its just plain HTTP.  Anyway, overall they&#8217;re getting much better and this is going to be a real problem for people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hannah</title>
		<link>http://parand.com/say/index.php/2006/07/06/anatomy-of-a-paypal-phishing-scam/comment-page-1/#comment-15433</link>
		<dc:creator>Hannah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parand.com/say/index.php/2006/07/06/anatomy-of-a-paypal-phishing-scam/#comment-15433</guid>
		<description>You say here that the site has been shut down, but I just got a similar phishing email yesterday from a paypal phisher, with a full functioning website. I did not enter my information but contacted paypal instead through their official website. Maybe they have successfully built another site, because it is up and running today! Beware...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You say here that the site has been shut down, but I just got a similar phishing email yesterday from a paypal phisher, with a full functioning website. I did not enter my information but contacted paypal instead through their official website. Maybe they have successfully built another site, because it is up and running today! Beware&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: streaky</title>
		<link>http://parand.com/say/index.php/2006/07/06/anatomy-of-a-paypal-phishing-scam/comment-page-1/#comment-11741</link>
		<dc:creator>streaky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 19:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parand.com/say/index.php/2006/07/06/anatomy-of-a-paypal-phishing-scam/#comment-11741</guid>
		<description>IE7&#039;s phishing capabilities are built on a database of sites, doesn&#039;t matter if it&#039;s good or not it&#039;ll let you know.. I like to use http://www.opendns.com/ as my DNS servers which have such a capability built in anyway - which works even better and faster :)

All users need to be educated in the simple facts - most banks and paypal will tell you quite simply that they will never, ever, ask you for such details, if you&#039;re dumb enough to believe such a mail it really is your own fault.

Course, the best thing to do with these things would be for the community at large to get together and fill these people&#039;s databases with invalid data rendering them completely useless - nobody is gonna trawl through 20,000 records looking for a few that may be correct :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IE7&#8217;s phishing capabilities are built on a database of sites, doesn&#8217;t matter if it&#8217;s good or not it&#8217;ll let you know.. I like to use <a href="http://www.opendns.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.opendns.com/</a> as my DNS servers which have such a capability built in anyway &#8211; which works even better and faster <img src='http://parand.com/say/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>All users need to be educated in the simple facts &#8211; most banks and paypal will tell you quite simply that they will never, ever, ask you for such details, if you&#8217;re dumb enough to believe such a mail it really is your own fault.</p>
<p>Course, the best thing to do with these things would be for the community at large to get together and fill these people&#8217;s databases with invalid data rendering them completely useless &#8211; nobody is gonna trawl through 20,000 records looking for a few that may be correct <img src='http://parand.com/say/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pooya</title>
		<link>http://parand.com/say/index.php/2006/07/06/anatomy-of-a-paypal-phishing-scam/comment-page-1/#comment-10037</link>
		<dc:creator>Pooya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 21:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parand.com/say/index.php/2006/07/06/anatomy-of-a-paypal-phishing-scam/#comment-10037</guid>
		<description>Neat investigation.  It would be interesting to try the anti-phishing capabilities of IE7 to see how it does with something that&#039;s well done like this one.  Post the next one you get and we can try it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neat investigation.  It would be interesting to try the anti-phishing capabilities of IE7 to see how it does with something that&#8217;s well done like this one.  Post the next one you get and we can try it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

